Las Cruces : e insurance

[SprinfieldKn]

Eduard Kabrinskiy - Azure devops pull request build - Кабринский Эдуард


<h1>Azure devops pull request build</h1>
<p>[youtube]</p>
Azure devops pull request build <a href="http://remmont.com">News updates</a> Azure devops pull request build
<h1>Example Build/Release Pipeline with Azure DevOps</h1>
<p style="clear: both"><img src="https://miro.medium.com/fit/c/96/96/2*gwB_521-xzFGuUvs2vOg9w.png" /></p>
<p>My team recently inherited several C# Class Library repositories ? unfortunately, none of them had a proper build pipeline set up.</em></p>
<p>I got the task of setting up the build/release pipeline in Azure DevOps.</em></p>
<p>Here?s what I did.</em></p>
<h1>Branching Strategy</h1>
<p>Looking through the commit history, it looked like the previous team was using trunk development workflow. In other words, there was no branching strategy to speak of? all commits were pushed straight to master.</p>
<p>While that works for some teams, it?s definitely not something my team is comfortable with. We use a variation of GitHub flow:</p>
<p style="clear: both"><img src="https://miro.medium.com/max/60/1*yV50uoat1HL_eqhWKdgiKA.png" /></p>
<p>The main difference comes from the way we release:</p>
<p><ul>
<li>At any time during development, developers may trigger a pre-release by pushing tags.</li>
<li>After merging to master, we trigger a production release by adding a tag. In our workflow, production tags are applied only after merging to master because we always squash merge pull requests.</em></li>
</ul>
</p>
<h1>The Project To Be Built</h1>
<p>The codebase we inherited are private repos, so for demonstration purposes I?ve created an example project which has a similar structure to the way the private codebase was set up.</p>
<p>Here?s what the project looks like:</p>
<p style="clear: both"><img src="https://miro.medium.com/max/60/1*2jAuPaKuCoEWg60WsuGBMA.png" /></p>
<p>And here?s how the folder structure looks like:</p>
<h1>Requirements</h1>
<p>Based on our workflow, we have to cater for the following scenarios:</p>
<p><ol>
<li>Commits are pushed: Build & Test only</em></li>
<li>Tags are pushed: Build, Test and Release (push to nuget repository)</em></li>
<li>Pull requests: Build & Test only</em></li>
<li>Daily builds: Build & Test only</em></li>
</ol>
</p>
<blockquote><p>Note: Daily builds became a requirement because in the past we?d inherited legacy code which had no active development in a year (sometimes even longer). And when we had to add a change or hotfix, we?d find the thing wouldn?t even build. Daily builds was our way of ensuring any code we were responsible for was, at the very least, healthy enough to build!</p></blockquote>
<p>Additionally, we need to ensure the following:</p>
<p>a) On release, verify that the tag conforms to semantic versioning. This is because nuget uses semantic versioning, and trying to push non-conforming packages to a nuget feed will result in errors</p>
<p>b) No pushing directly to master branch</p>
<p>c) Pull requests must be approved by another developer on the team</p>
<p>d) When merging, pull requests must use squash merge</p>
<h1>azure-pipelines.yml</h1>
<p>If you?re just interested in what the azure-pipeline file looked like, here it is. I?ve left comments to explain what each section is for.</p>
<h2>Azure devops pull request build</h2>

<h3>Azure devops pull request build</h3>
<p>[youtube]</p>
Azure devops pull request build <a href="http://remmont.com">Latest news live</a> Azure devops pull request build
<h4>Azure devops pull request build</h4>
Setting up a CI/CD pipeline for .NET project using Azure DevOps Pipelines yaml, pipeline as code, continuous delivery using Azure DevOps
<h5>Azure devops pull request build</h5>
Azure devops pull request build <a href="http://remmont.com">Azure devops pull request build</a> Azure devops pull request build
SOURCE: <h6>Azure devops pull request build</h6> <a href="https://dev-ops.engineer/">Azure devops pull request build</a> Azure devops pull request build
#tags#[replace: -,-Azure devops pull request build] Azure devops pull request build#tags#
Kabrinskiy Eduard
new

[SprinfieldKn]

Devops itil - Эдуард Кабринский


<h1>Devops itil</h1>
<p>[youtube]</p>
Devops itil <a href="http://remmont.com">National news stories</a> Devops itil
<h1>ITIL vs DevOps: What?s The Difference?</h1>
<p style="clear: both"><img src="https://blogs.bmc.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/ITIL_and_DevOps_.jpg.optimal.jpg" /></p>
<p style="clear: both"><img src="https://blogs.bmc.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Charles-Betz_avatar_1429302347.jpg.optimal.jpg" /></p>
<p style="clear: both"><img src="https://blogs.bmc.com/wp-content/plugins/pdf-print/images/pdf.png" /><img src="https://blogs.bmc.com/wp-content/plugins/pdf-print/images/print.png" /></p>
<p>With the rise of Agile and DevOps, what becomes of ITIL ? ? Gene Kim, the author of The Phoenix Project (along with Keven Behr & George Spafford), states:</p>
<p><em>?ITIL and ITSM still are best codifications of the business processes that underpin IT Operations, and actually describe many of the capabilities needed in order for IT Operations to support a DevOps-style work stream.?</em></p>
<h3>Download Now: ITIL 4 Best Practice e-Books</h3>
<p>These all-new for 2020 ITIL e-books highlight important elements of ITIL 4 best practices. Quickly understand key changes and actionable concepts, written by ITIL 4 contributors.</p>
<p style="clear: both"><img src="https://blogs.bmc.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/itil-4-ebooks.png" /></p>
<p>But, with all due respect to Gene (who I consider a friend), I?m going to take the other side of the argument.</p>
<p><strong>Giving Credit Where Due</strong></p>
<p>Let?s be clear: ITIL is important. Around two million people have been trained in it, and as the closest thing to an industry standard for IT management that currently exists, it has global reach. Lots of people <em>read</em> the ITIL volumes as guidance to their IT organizations. Throughout all its versions, ITIL has been framed as a complete approach to managing the IT function, with the specific exceptions of project methodology and systems architecture. Plus, it?s worth noting that ITIL also informs the product directions of vendors selling IT management tools; in fact, they often market their IT service management tools as ?supporting? the ITIL processes.</p>
<p>Also (despite some common misperceptions), ITIL is not <em>explicitly</em> opposed to Agile and DevOps. The Service Design volume supports iterative and incremental design, and mentions Agile and XP. And Service Strategy, with its strong grounding in current management theory, mentions the need for continual feedback between the ITIL service lifecycle stages (Strategy, Design, Transition, Operations, Improvement). And finally, I agree with my friend Jeff Sussna, who says that ITIL has made an indelible contribution in promoting service-centric, outside-in, customer-focused thinking as an alternative to overly technical and piecemeal approaches to supporting the customer.</p>
<p><strong>Now, the Complaints</strong> </p>
<p>So, what are some of the problems with ITIL from an Agile and DevOps perspective? Here are some of my questions and observations:</p>
<p><strong><em>What is ITIL really saying?</em></strong> Re-reading as sympathetically as I can, I find that the overall ITIL narrative is still sequential, plan-centric, and deterministic.</p>
<p><ul>
<li>We should first analytically determine a service strategy and charter the service.</li>
<li>Then create a detailed Service Design Package, and organize resources into development projects that are designed, executed and transitioned in a high-ceremony fashion to operations (as a discrete function).</li>
<li>And when that?s done, continual service improvement can start.</li>
<li>We ensure that everything is documented, and we assume that organizational resources are available and capable of generating and consuming this documentation.</li>
</ul>
</p>
<p>Even with sporadic mentions of Agile and feedback, the deep, repeated narrative is one of planning, control, and documentation.</p>
<p><strong><em>How is ITIL saying it?</em></strong> As a data modeler and liberal arts student, word choices are important to me. They indicate much about overall worldview. ITIL may supportively mention a concept, such as iterative design, but that doesn?t mean it is primary in the overall ITIL narrative. As a simple test , if you compare various key Agile terms (feedback, iterative, incremental, collaboration, experiment) to terms more often associated with non-Agile approaches (plan, process, procedure, document), you?ll see skewed proportions. For every mention of ?iterative? or ?feedback,? there are ten mentions of ?plan? or ?planning.? Notably, the word ?experiment? appears only a few times in Service Strategy and not at all across the remaining volumes. This surprising omission raises legitimate questions about ITIL?s relevance for Lean Startup philosophy (which one is likely to find influencing large enterprises as well as true start-ups). Somewhere between the service charter and the service design package is a need to build a minimum viable product and test the market hypothesis.</p>
<p><strong><em>What are the organizational assumptions?</em></strong> The assumption is that functional silos will continue to exist, with specialized ticketing processes ensuring delivery and alignment. The idea of loosely coupled, cross functional, two-pizza product teams using lightweight, unified workflow (e.g. Kanban) is not well supported in ITIL, as far as I can see. For example, see the videos on Spotify Engineering Culture, part 1 and part 2. ?Process? is barely mentioned.</p>
<p><strong><em>What about this curious problem of configuration management?</em></strong> Configuration is important. ITIL?s insistence on its centrality is a good thing, but the actual industry practices do not align well with how ITIL views the problem. Source control and package management, coupled with massive infrastructure automation, are increasingly how work gets done today. Perhaps you could call all that a ?CMS,? but that?s not the terminology most practitioners are using. And then what of the structured CMDB that traditionally underpins the service management processes? What is presented as ?best practice? and an industry consensus in ITIL is actually a complex, fast-evolving, and very unsettled problem. Even my friend Gene seemingly agrees that CMDB and ITIL are problematic with respect to Cloud.</p>
<p><strong>Some Anecdotes from Our Field</strong></p>
<p>ITIL is under scrutiny in IT organizations around the world. Representatives from ING Bank notoriously stated, ?we kicked out most of the process managers?? (However, later in the same presentation they say that they still recognize the need for processes and, in private correspondence with me, have reinforced that the core ITIL processes are still key for them.) They also discourage the use of an ITIL Problem process if the Problem can be understood as a user story. Author Thomas Limoncelli, in <em>The Practice of Cloud Systems Administration</em><em>,</em> advises using common ticketing across development and operations, while Scaled Agile Framework creator Dean Leffingwell advocates in his <em>Agile Software Requirements</em> ?prevent[ing] the team from getting instructions from a variety of sources.?</p>
<p>Also, I recently talked to a senior IT executive at a Fortune 50 corporation. He complained that the end result of significant investments in ITIL and PMBOK is 30+ ?processes? that, in the aggregate, amount to a highly ineffective operating model.</p>
<p><strong>The Central Failure</strong></p>
<p>These anecdotes point out the most fundamental problems with ITIL: its failure to address the critical importance of managing work in process, batch sizes, fast feedback, multitasking, and queues (e.g. processes), resulting in gridlock. Lean product management specialist Don Reinertsen (whom I call the ?man behind the curtain? of Agile, due to his influence on multiple Agile thought leaders) has made a compelling case for the <strong>centrality</strong> of these concerns in product management. And creating and delivering IT services is merely a specialized form of product management.</p>
<p>While ITIL briefly discusses queuing theory, I?d point out that there is a difference between a mention and the overall message. The overall ITIL takeaway is that:</p>
<p><ul>
<li>The IT pipeline consists of large batches of accurately planned work transitioned between strategy, development, and operations;</li>
<li>Process solves your problems. ITIL enumerates 26, plus the queues implicit in formalized ?services? in the catalog;</li>
<li>Multi-tasking and context switching are not concerns with respect to enterprise IT processes;</li>
<li>Risk is mitigated through planning and documentation.</li>
</ul>
</p>
<p>ITIL is clear that one does not implement the full set of 26 ITIL processes just because they are in ITIL. But ITIL?s guidance on exactly HOW one might decide which processes to implement is, again, very sequential; as discussed in the later parts of Service Strategy, one carefully analyzes, plans, and implements. There is little if any support, as far as I can see, for the kind of iterative experimentation on the operating model that (for example) the Lean Kanban method calls for.</p>
<p><strong>What Comes Next?</strong></p>
<p>We are all on a journey of discovery. I have great respect for the ITIL authors, who are human beings like the rest of us, and I know that a number of them are reading and keeping current with Agile theory. There is no question that the well-known core operational ITIL processes (Incident, Change, etc.) have added value, not diminished it, in many IT organizations.</p>
<p>As I noted in my last blog, IT organizations are complex, socio-technical systems. Radical interventions, such as ?get rid of all processes,? would be as unwise as going back to the bad old days of last-minute, large-scale release integrations. I also wish the just-announced ITIL Practitioner Architects team (including Phoenix Project author Kevin Behr) all the best.</p>
<p>But the bulk of ITIL was written 10 years ago; I know that the ideas I have this year are far removed from what I thought back then. Simply put, <strong><em>ITIL as a published artifact is becoming outdated</em></strong>. New theories and understandings are emerging, led by people like Reinertsen and Mark Kennaley (<em>SDLC 3.0</em> author, who just released his new book <em>Value Stream</em>). In Agile terms, ITIL has been released as a series of very large batches across the decades, with no provision for feedback or ongoing refactoring. Compare this to the ongoing evolution of the Agile Alliance?s Guide to Agile Practices.</p>
<p>So where does this leave us? I don?t know. Perhaps Agile overlays and interpretations of ITIL can be developed, but I think this will be difficult. Retrofitting these ideas onto the existing ITIL body of knowledge is, to my mind, an impossible task. There are questions of basic mental models, culture, and the financial interests of a large, entrenched training ecosystem.</p>
<p>To fulfill its huge scope and ambition, ITIL <strong>requires an improved foundational model</strong> of IT delivery as a socio-technical system that is centrally concerned with <strong>execution, feedback, and flow</strong>. All process recommendations need to be founded on, and tempered by, such a core model. And yet a complete ITIL rewrite also seems unlikely, based on what I am hearing through industry channels.</p>
<p>I think the important thing we can do is to continue an open dialogue in the industry on our frameworks of understanding, and how they need to evolve to better support the challenges of our complex IT universe. I look forward to further discussions and correspondence with all those who are concerned and passionate about this topic.</p>
<p>Disclaimer: Charles Betz participates in the Open Group IT4IT Forum, which is developing an open, architectural standard for the business of IT, and where he currently leads the Agile Workstream. The opinions expressed here are his own.</p>
<h3>New for 2020: ITIL 4 Best Practice e-Books</h3>
<p>These all-new for 2020 ITIL e-Books highlight important elements of ITIL 4 best practices so that you can quickly understand key changes and actionable concepts. Download now for free!</p>
<h2>Devops itil</h2>

<h3>Devops itil</h3>
<p>[youtube]</p>
Devops itil <a href="http://remmont.com">Live news</a> Devops itil
<h4>Devops itil</h4>
ITIL vs DevOps: What?s The Difference? With the rise of Agile and DevOps, what becomes of ITIL ? ? Gene Kim, the author of The Phoenix Project (along with Keven Behr & George
<h5>Devops itil</h5>
Devops itil <a href="http://remmont.com">Devops itil</a> Devops itil
SOURCE: <h6>Devops itil</h6> <a href="https://dev-ops.engineer/">Devops itil</a> Devops itil
#tags#[replace: -,-Devops itil] Devops itil#tags#
https://ssylki.info/?who=interest-rates.remmont.com https://ssylki.info/?who=real-estate-li ... emmont.com https://ssylki.info/?who=remmont.com/it ... e-gossip-2 https://ssylki.info/?who=best-insurance ... emmont.com https://ssylki.info/?who=car-rental-japan.remmont.com

[SprinfieldKn]

Azure devops server 2019 rc2 - Кабринский Эдуард


<h1>Azure devops server 2019 rc2</h1>
<p>[youtube]</p>
Azure devops server 2019 rc2 <a href="http://remmont.com">News highlights</a> Azure devops server 2019 rc2
<h1>Force Azure DevOps Server 2019 to manually sync with ActiveDirectory</h1>
<p>We have an on-premise Azure DevOps Server that works with a corporate ActiveDirectory. When adding new users, Azure DevOps Server pulls their information from ActiveDirectory. But the user's information was later updated in ActiveDirectory to fix an issue - their email account was missing.</p>
<p>In the past, I have been able to remove and re-add the user to Azure DevOps Server to fix the problem, as my administrative account has access and can see the user's email in ActiveDirectory. But the users are not being picked up by the sync job in Azure DevOps Server anymore, so their email address continues to be blank. (Users have been added for weeks or months without the update being picked up.)</p>
<p>We have verified that the Azure DevOps Server service account can see the email address in ActiveDirectory when logged into the server. So it's not an access issue with the service account.</p>
<p>How do I manually force Azure DevOps Server to run an ActiveDirectory sync? There used to be a JobService web service that I could access for this in previous versions of TFS, but that service doesn't appear to be available anymore, or is no longer scheduled to run.</p>
<h2>2 Answers 2</h2>
<p>TFS/Azure DevOps Server uses a background synchronization job, scheduled every hour, to look for changes in Active Directory. So changes you make to Active Directory groups do not get reflected in TFS immediately. Instead, TFS will synchronize those groups regularly (by default every hour).</p>
<p>You may try to restart <strong>TFS Job Agent service</strong> to see whether it helps.</p>
<p>Since no solution has worked, I decided to see what could be done from a coding perspective. The answer turned out to be straightforward. <strong>NOTE:</strong> Please make sure that you check the solutions provided below prior to the coding approach, as Azure DevOps Server is supposed to be refreshing identities automatically.</p>
<p>First, I found a Stack Overflow article about finding users by name:</p>
<p>This can be used to fetch a user or a group by its display name, among other attributes, using the ReadIdentity method.</p>
<p>This same IIDentityServiceProvider also has a method on it called RefreshIdentity. This method, when called with the IdentityDescriptor of the user, forces the identity to be immediately refreshed from its provider. See the documentation here:</p>
<p>This method returns true if the refresh was successful, or false if the refresh failed. it is also possible for the refresh to throw an exception. For example, the Azure DevOps identity named "Project Collection Build Service" is listed as a user when retrieved, but this identity throws an exception when refreshed.</p>
<p>Using these methods, a complete tool was able to be constructed to repair the identities of individual users, or to scan through all users in the group "Project Collection Valid Users" and refresh the entire system. Using this tool, we were able to fix our synchronization issues between Azure DevOps Server and Active Directory.</p>
<p>Here's some sample code showing how to use these methods:</p>
<h2>Azure devops server 2019 rc2</h2>

<h3>Azure devops server 2019 rc2</h3>
<p>[youtube]</p>
Azure devops server 2019 rc2 <a href="http://remmont.com">News report</a> Azure devops server 2019 rc2
<h4>Azure devops server 2019 rc2</h4>
Force Azure DevOps Server 2019 to manually sync with ActiveDirectory We have an on-premise Azure DevOps Server that works with a corporate ActiveDirectory. When adding new users, Azure DevOps
<h5>Azure devops server 2019 rc2</h5>
Azure devops server 2019 rc2 <a href="http://remmont.com">Azure devops server 2019 rc2</a> Azure devops server 2019 rc2
SOURCE: <h6>Azure devops server 2019 rc2</h6> <a href="https://dev-ops.engineer/">Azure devops server 2019 rc2</a> Azure devops server 2019 rc2
#tags#[replace: -,-Azure devops server 2019 rc2] Azure devops server 2019 rc2#tags#
https://ssylki.info/?who=beach-house-re ... emmont.com https://ssylki.info/?who=remmont.com/th ... rs-careers https://ssylki.info/?who=family-health- ... emmont.com https://ssylki.info/?who=remmont.com/in ... auto-sales https://ssylki.info/?who=real-estate-au ... t.com/news

[SprinfieldKn]

Azure devops variables - Эдуард Кабринский


<h1>Azure devops variables</h1>
<p>[youtube]</p>
Azure devops variables <a href="http://remmont.com">Latest hot news</a> Azure devops variables
<h1>Azure devops variables</h1>
<p>GitHub is home to over 50 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.</p>
<h3>GitHub is where the world builds software</h3>
<p>Millions of developers and companies build, ship, and maintain their software on GitHub ? the largest and most advanced development platform in the world.</p>
<h2> azure-devops-docs / docs / pipelines / build / variables.md</strong> </h2>
<ul>
<li>Go to file T</li>
<li>Go to line L</li>
<li>Copy path</li>
</ul>
<p>Use predefined variables</h1></p>
<p>Variables give you a convenient way to get key bits of data into various parts of your pipeline. This is the comprehensive list of predefined variables.</p>
<p>These variables are automatically set by the system and read-only. (The exceptions are Build.Clean and System.Debug.) Learn more about working with variables.</p>
<blockquote><p>[!NOTE] You can use release variables in your deploy tasks to share the common information (e.g. ? Environment Name, Resource Group, etc)</p></blockquote>
<p>. moniker range="> tfs-2017"</p>
<p>This is a deprecated variable that modifies how the build agent cleans up source. To learn how to clean up source, see Clean the local repo on the agent.</p>
<p>. moniker range=">= tfs-2015</p>
<p>System.AccessToken is a special variable that carries the security token used by the running build.</p>
<p>In YAML, you must explicitly map System.AccessToken into the pipeline using a variable. You can do this at the step or task level:</p>
<p>You can configure the default scope for System.AccessToken using build job authorization scope.</p>
<p>You can allow scripts and tasks to access System.AccessToken at the job level.</p>
<p>Navigate to the job</p>
<p>Under <strong>Additional options</strong>, check the <strong>Allow scripts to access the OAuth token</strong> box.</p>
<p>Checking this box also leaves the credential set in Git so that you can run pushes and pulls in your scripts.</p>
<p>For more detailed logs to debug pipeline problems, define System.Debug and set it to true .</p>
<p>Edit your pipeline.</p>
<p>Select <strong>Variables</strong>.</p>
<p>Add a new variable with the name System.Debug and value true .</p>
<p>. image type="content" source="media/options/system-debug.png" alt-text="Set System Debug to true".</p>
<p>Save the new variable.</p>
<p>How are the identity variables set?</h3></p>
<p>The value depends on what caused the build.</p>
<p> <table> <thead> <tr> <th>If the build is triggered.</th> <th>Then the Build.QueuedBy and Build.QueuedById values are based on.</th> <th>Then the Build.RequestedFor and Build.RequestedForId values are based on.</th> </tr> </th> <tbody> <tr> <td>In Git or TFVC by the Continuous integration (CI) triggers</td> <td>The system identity, for example: [DefaultCollection]\Project Collection Service Accounts</td> <td>The person who pushed or checked in the changes.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>In Git or by a branch policy build.</td> <td>The system identity, for example: [DefaultCollection]\Project Collection Service Accounts</td> <td>The person who checked in the changes.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>In TFVC by a gated check-in trigger</td> <td>The person who checked in the changes.</td> <td>The person who checked in the changes.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>In Git or TFVC by the Scheduled triggers</td> <td>The system identity, for example: [DefaultCollection]\Project Collection Service Accounts</td> <td>The system identity, for example: [DefaultCollection]\Project Collection Service Accounts</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Because you clicked the <strong>Queue build</strong> button</td> <td>You</td> <td>You</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> </p>
<p>You can?t perform that action at this time.</p>
<p>You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.</p>
<h2>Azure devops variables</h2>

<h3>Azure devops variables</h3>
<p>[youtube]</p>
Azure devops variables <a href="http://remmont.com">National news stories</a> Azure devops variables
<h4>Azure devops variables</h4>
This repo is the home of the official Azure DevOps documentation for Microsoft. GitHub Issues filed in this repository should be for problems with the documentation. - MicrosoftDocs/azure-devops-docs
<h5>Azure devops variables</h5>
Azure devops variables <a href="http://remmont.com">Azure devops variables</a> Azure devops variables
SOURCE: <h6>Azure devops variables</h6> <a href="https://dev-ops.engineer/">Azure devops variables</a> Azure devops variables
#tags#[replace: -,-Azure devops variables] Azure devops variables#tags#
https://ssylki.info/?who=cheap-car-insu ... t.com/news https://ssylki.info/?who=small-loans.remmont.com https://ssylki.info/?who=humana-health- ... emmont.com https://ssylki.info/?who=remmont.com/of ... -cabinet-2 https://ssylki.info/?who=mortgage-loan.remmont.com

[SprinfieldKn]

Itil devops - Кабринский Эдуард


<h1>Itil devops</h1>
<p>[youtube]</p>
Itil devops <a href="http://remmont.com">New news</a> Itil devops
<h1>Devops, ITIL 4 and Agile</h1>
<h3>Sunil MohalFollow</h3>
<h4>ITIL Expert; ITIL 4 Managing Professional</h4>
<ul>
<li>Like 200</li>
<li>Comment 14 </ul>
<p>The much anticipated ITIL 4 best practice framework was released on Feb 28 2019. Axelos and the team entrusted with the development of the new version have taken a very hard look at ITIL as it existed along with other frameworks like Devops, Agile, Lean to provide practitioners a very powerful and flexible framework. The basic approach in the earlier version ?The Lifecycle Approach? has been replaced by the new ITIL architecture ?The Service Value System?, or the ITIL SVS. The introduction of the service value chain and the concept of practices add another element of change.</p>
<p>While ITIL has traditionally helped to standardize the selection, planning, delivery and maintenance of IT services, to improve efficiency and achieve predictable service delivery; Agile has been an iterative approach to software delivery that builds software incrementally from the start of the project.</p>
<p>DevOps is a bridge between the two and promotes collaboration between Development and Operations Teams to deploy code to production faster in an automated & repeatable way. In ?The Phoenix Project: A Novel About IT, DevOps, and Helping Your Business Win.? Gene Kim, gives a very interesting perspective on the principles underpinning Devops, named as ?The Three Ways?. The ?Three Ways? describe the values and philosophies that frame the processes, procedures, practices of DevOps.</p>
<p>In my perspective, it is in the guiding principles in which we see a lot of affinity of ITIL 4 with Devops and Agile. In terms of principles, ITIL 4 prescribes 7 Guiding principles while the Agile Manifesto prescribes 12. There is a great overlap between Devops ? 3 ways, ITIL 4 Guiding principles and the Agile Manifesto. They are represented by the table as shown.</p>
<p>The ?Keep it simple? principle in ITIL 4 maps very closely with ?Simplicity -the art of maximizing the amount of work not done-??-??is essential? in the Agile Manifesto. The 7th ITIL principle ?Optimize and automate? maps closely with the Agile principle of ?Continuous attention to technical excellence and good design enhances agility?.</p>
<p>In conclusion; one can think of ITIL 4 evolving from an orderly (bit bureaucratic?) system based on processes to a system geared to facing the real-time challenges for speedy implementation of services.</p>
<h2>Itil devops</h2>

<h3>Itil devops</h3>
<p>[youtube]</p>
Itil devops <a href="http://remmont.com">Latest news</a> Itil devops
<h4>Itil devops</h4>
The much anticipated ITIL 4 best practice framework was released on Feb 28 2019. Axelos and the team entrusted with the development of the new version have taken a very hard look at ITIL as it existed along with other frameworks like Devops, Agile, Lean to provide practitioners a very powerful and f
<h5>Itil devops</h5>
Itil devops <a href="http://remmont.com">Itil devops</a> Itil devops
SOURCE: <h6>Itil devops</h6> <a href="https://dev-ops.engineer/">Itil devops</a> Itil devops
#tags#[replace: -,-Itil devops] Itil devops#tags#
https://ssylki.info/?who=remmont.com/st ... -and-video https://ssylki.info/?who=remmont.com/dt ... ffer-today https://ssylki.info/?who=cheap-car-insu ... emmont.com https://ssylki.info/?who=remmont.com/taj-pop-star https://ssylki.info/?who=remmont.com/hu ... le-housing

[SprinfieldKn]

Azure devops expert - Эдуард Кабринский


<h1>Azure devops expert</h1>
<p>[youtube]</p>
Azure devops expert <a href="http://remmont.com">Top news today</a> Azure devops expert
<h1>AZ-400: Azure DevOps Engineer Expert</h1>
<p>This 5-day course provides students with the key knowledge to help prepare for exam AZ-400, which will lead to the new Azure DevOps Engineer Expert certification. In this course you will learn to design a DevOps strategy and how to implement DevOps Development Processes, Continuous Integration and Delivery, Dependency Management, Application Infrastructure and Continuous Feedback.</p>
<h2>Azurekampanje 6.oktober - 30.november 2020</h2>
<p>Skaff deg anerkjente Azure sertifiseringer! Foreta bestilling av dette kurset innen 30.november p? en av de tilgjengelige datoene, og f? Exam Replay med ?velsestest inkludert i prisen. ?velsestesten hjelper deg til ? vite n?r du er klar for ? ta eksamen. Exam Replay gir deg 2 fors?k p? ? best? eksamen!</p>
<p style="clear: both"><img src="https://www.glasspaper.no/contentassets/3abfc209b69a4f889dde6bb2f304c1eb/image1xud.png" /></p>
<h2>Prerequisites</h2>
<p>Fundamental knowledge about Azure, version control, Agile software development, and core software development principles. It would be helpful to have experience from an organization that delivers software and experience with virtual machines and containers, and some exposure to automation and scripting.</p>
<h2>Audience</h2>
<p>DevOps professionals who combine people, process, and technologies to continuously deliver valuable products and services that meet end user needs and business objectives.</p>
<h2>Course content</h2>
<p>This 5 day course contains of these modules:</p>
<p><strong>Implementing DevOps Development Processes:</strong><br />You will learn how to use source control, scale Git for an enterprise, and implement and manage build infrastructure.</p>
<p><strong>Implementing Continuous Integration:</strong><br />You will learn how to implement continuous integration in an Azure DevOps pipeline, how to manage code quality and security principles, and how to implement a container build strategy.</p>
<p><strong>Implementing Continuous Delivery:</strong><br />You will learn how to design a release strategy, set up a release management workflow, and implement an appropriate deployment pattern.</p>
<p><strong>Implementing Dependency Management:</strong><br />You will learn how to design a dependency management strategy and manage security and compliance.</p>
<p><strong>Implementing Application Infrastructure:</strong><br />You will learn how to implement infrastructure as code and configuration management, how to provision Azure infrastructure using common automation tools, and how to deploy an application infrastructure using various Azure services and deployment methodologies. Students will also learn how to integrate 3rd party deployment tools with Azure, such as Chef and Puppet to incorporate compliance and security into the release pipeline.</p>
<p><strong>Implementing Continuous Feedback:</strong><br />You will learn how to recommend and design system feedback mechanisms, implement a process for routing system feedback to development teams, and optimize feedback mechanisms.</p>
<p><strong>Designing a DevOps Strategy:</strong><br />You will learn how to plan for transformation, select a project, and create team structures. You will also learn how to develop quality and security strategies. Planning for migrating and consolidating artifacts and source control will also be covered.</p>
<h2>Certification</h2>
<p>This course is recommended as preparation for exam AZ-400: Microsoft Azure DevOps Solutions. This exam is the only exam you need to pass in order to get the new certification: Azure DevOps Engineer Expert.</p>
<p>The exam fee is not included in the course price.</p>
<h2>Azure devops expert</h2>

<h3>Azure devops expert</h3>
<p>[youtube]</p>
Azure devops expert <a href="http://remmont.com">National news</a> Azure devops expert
<h4>Azure devops expert</h4>
This 5-day course provides students with the key knowledge to help prepare for exam AZ-400, which will lead to the new Azure DevOps Engineer Expert certification. In this course you will learn to design a DevOps strategy and how to implem ?
<h5>Azure devops expert</h5>
Azure devops expert <a href="http://remmont.com">Azure devops expert</a> Azure devops expert
SOURCE: <h6>Azure devops expert</h6> <a href="https://dev-ops.engineer/">Azure devops expert</a> Azure devops expert
#tags#[replace: -,-Azure devops expert] Azure devops expert#tags#
https://ssylki.info/?who=classic-car-in ... emmont.com https://ssylki.info/?who=remmont.com/harp-sohal-gossip https://ssylki.info/?who=foreclosed-homes.remmont.com https://ssylki.info/?who=renta.remmont. ... lood-banks https://ssylki.info/?who=landlord-insur ... t.com/news

[SprinfieldKn]

Devops yaml - Кабринский Эдуард


<h1>Devops yaml</h1>
<p>[youtube]</p>
Devops yaml <a href="http://remmont.com">News headlines</a> Devops yaml
<h1>Azure DevOps Pipelines: Reusable YAML</h1>
<p>In this post, we are going to refactor our sample Azure DevOps Pipeline to move some of the redundant YAML to a new file and replace the redundant parts of our main YAML file. This post is going to build on the Azure DevOps project created in previous posts. If you are just joining this series check out the previous posts to find out how the project has progressed.</p>
<p>Getting Started with Azure DevOps<br />Pipeline Creation in Azure DevOps<br />Azure DevOps Publish Artifacts for ASP.NET Core<br />Azure DevOps Pipelines: Multiple Jobs in YAML </p>
<h3>Starting YAML</h3>
<p>The following is the YAML for our current pipeline that builds two different web applications using two different jobs. Looking at the two jobs you will notice that they both have the same steps. The only difference in the steps is which project to build (WebApp1.csproj or WebApp2.csproj) and what to call the published artifact (WebApp1 or WebApp2). When developing applications we would never stand for this level of duplication and the same should apply to our pipelines.</p>
<h3>Add a New File</h3>
<p>To attack the duplication above we need to take the shared steps from above and move them somewhere they can be reused. We will be walking through the steps using the Azure DevOps web site and committing directly to the master branch, but these same steps could be performed locally or on the web on any branch. First, from the Repos section of the site we need to add a new file by clicking the three dots at the level we want the file added. In this case, we are adding to the root of the repo but the same option is available on any folder.</p>
<p style="clear: both"><img src="https://i0.wp.com/elanderson.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/azureDevOpsReposRootAddFileSelected.png" /></p>
<p>A dialog will show where you can enter the <strong>New file name</strong>, we are going to use build.yml in this case. Next, click <strong>Create</strong> to continue.</p>
<p style="clear: both"><img src="https://i0.wp.com/elanderson.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/azureDevOpsReposRootAddFileDialogCreateSelected.png" /></p>
<h3>Shared YAML</h3>
<p>Now that we have a new file we can start building the new YAML that will handle the repeated steps from the original jobs. The first thing we are going to do is define a set of <strong>parameters</strong> that this set of steps can be called with. We are going to use this to pass what project to build, which build configuration to use, and what name the published artifact. The following is the definition of our parameters.</p>
<p>We can then use these parameters in the rest of the file using the <strong>$<< parameterName >></strong> syntax. Note that any pipeline variables are also available using the <strong>$(variableName)</strong> syntax. The following bit of YAML shows both types in the arguments line.</p>
<p>While you can use pipeline variables I recommend passing all the values you need via parameters for the same reason that we try to avoid global variables when doing general programming. I?m using both here to show the usage of each. The following is the full YAML in our new file.</p>
<p>Finally, commit the changes to the new file.</p>
<h3>Using Shared YAML</h3>
<p>Not that we have the YAML that is the same between our two build jobs we can switch back over to our main YAML file, <strong>azure-pipelines.yml</strong> in the sample, and remove the steps we are wanting to replace. While the jobs will both have a steps section the only thing we will have left in them is a template call to our other YAML file, <strong>build.yml</strong> for the sample, that passes the parameters to run the other file with. The following is the resulting YAML file with the call to the shared file in both jobs highlighted.</p>
<h3>Wrapping Up</h3>
<p>Being able to remove duplication from your YAML files should help improve the maintainability of your pipelines. I know the samples don?t show it, but the template is just a step and you could have other steps before or after it just like you would with normal tasks.</p>
<h2>Devops yaml</h2>

<h3>Devops yaml</h3>
<p>[youtube]</p>
Devops yaml <a href="http://remmont.com">Newspaper headlines</a> Devops yaml
<h4>Devops yaml</h4>
Azure DevOps Pipelines: Reusable YAML In this post, we are going to refactor our sample Azure DevOps Pipeline to move some of the redundant YAML to a new file and replace the redundant parts of
<h5>Devops yaml</h5>
Devops yaml <a href="http://remmont.com">Devops yaml</a> Devops yaml
SOURCE: <h6>Devops yaml</h6> <a href="https://dev-ops.engineer/">Devops yaml</a> Devops yaml
#tags#[replace: -,-Devops yaml] Devops yaml#tags#
https://ssylki.info/?who=auto-connection.remmont.com https://ssylki.info/?who=remmont.com/ua-al-and-video https://ssylki.info/?who=remmont.com/zendaya-rap https://ssylki.info/?who=boat-insurance.remmont.com https://ssylki.info/?who=acreage.remmont.com

[SprinfieldKn]

Martin fowler devops - Eduard Kabrinskiy


<h1>Martin fowler devops</h1>
<p>[youtube]</p>
Martin fowler devops <a href="http://remmont.com">America news today</a> Martin fowler devops
<h1>Martin Fowler: Specification By Example</h1>
<h3>Specification By Example isn't the way most of us have been brought up to think of specifications. This doesn't mean it isn't valuable, though.</h3>
<p>Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.</p>
<p>I was attending a workshop at XP/Agile Universe in 2002 when the phrase 'Specification By Example' struck me as a way to describe one of roles of testing in XP.</p>
<blockquote><p>This is a 2011 Retread of post orginally made on 18 Mar 2004.</p></blockquote>
<p>(These days it's terribly unfashionable to talk about Test Driven Development (TDD) having anything to do with testing, but like Jon I do think that having a comprehensive automated test suite is more valuable than the term 'side-effect' implies. Rather like if someone offered me a million dollars to hike up a mountain. I may say that the main purpose of the hike is the enjoyment of nature, but the side-effect to my wallet is hardly trivial. )</p>
<p>Specification By Example isn't the way most of us have been brought up to think of specifications. Specifications are supposed to be general, to cover all cases. Examples only highlight a few points; you have to infer the generalizations yourself.</p>
<blockquote><p>This does mean that Specification By Example can't be the only requirements technique you use, but it doesn't mean that it can't take a leading role.</p></blockquote>
<p>So far the dominant idea with rigorous specifications, that is those that can be clearly judged to be passed or failed, <strong>is to use pre and post conditions</strong>. These techniques dominate in formal methods, and also underpin Design by Contract. These techniques have their place, but they aren't ideal.</p>
<p>The pre-post conditions can be very easy to write in some situations, but others can be very tricky. I've tried to use them in a number enterprise application settings, and I've found that in many situations it's as hard to write the pre and post conditions as it is to write the solution.</p>
<p>One of the great things about specification by example is that examples are usually much easier to come up with, particularly for the non-nerds who we write the software for. (Timothy Budd pointed out that while you can show a lot of stack behavior with pre and post conditions, it's very tricky to write pre and post conditions that show the LIFO property.)</p>
<p>An important property of TDD tests is that they involve a double-check. In fact this highlights an amusing little lie of the XP community. They make a very strong point of saying things Once and Only Once, but in fact they always say things twice: once in the code and once in the tests.</p>
<p>Kent has pointed out that this double-check principle is a vital principle, and it's certainly one that humans use all the time. The value of the double check is very much tied into using different methods for each side of the double check.</p>
<blockquote><p>Combining Specification By Example with production code means that you have both things said quite differently, which increases their ability to find errors.</p></blockquote>
<p>The formal specification community have constantly had trouble verifying that a design satisfies a specification, particularly in doing this without error prone humans. For Specification By Example, this is easy. <strong>Another case of Specification By Example being less valuable in theory but more valuable in practice</strong>.</p>
<p>One Design by Contract fan pointed out that if you write a specification in terms of tests, then the supplier could satisfy the specification by just returning hard-coded responses to the specific test inputs. My flippant answer to this is that if you are concerned about this then the issue of tests versus Design by Contract is the least of your worries.</p>
<p>But there is a serious point here. <strong>Tests are always going to be incomplete</strong>, so they always have to be backed up with other mechanisms. Being the twisted mind that I am, I actually see this as a plus. Since it's clear that Specification By Example isn't enough, it's clear that you need to do more to ensure that everything is properly communicated. One of the most dangerous things about a traditional requirements specification is when people think that once they've written it they are done communicating.</p>
<p>Specification By Example only works in the context of a working relationship where both sides are collaborating and not fighting. The examples trigger abstractions in the design team while keeping the abstractions grounded. You do need more - things like regular conversation, techniques like Domain Driven Design, indeed even doses of Design by Contract.</p>
<p>While I've never had the opportunity to use Design by Contract fully (i.e. with Eiffel) I regularly think about interfaces in contractual terms. Specification By Example is a powerful tool, perhaps my most used tool, but never my only tool.</p>
<p>(For more thinking on Specification By Example, if not by that name, take a look at Brian Marick's writings. Somewhere on his site there probably is one super page that sums up his view on it. Of course finding it is less valuable than reading all the stuff there while you're trying)</p>
<h2>Martin fowler devops</h2>

<h3>Martin fowler devops</h3>
<p>[youtube]</p>
Martin fowler devops <a href="http://remmont.com">New</a> Martin fowler devops
<h4>Martin fowler devops</h4>
Specification By Example isn't the way most of us have been brought up to think of specifications. This doesn't mean it isn't valuable, though.
<h5>Martin fowler devops</h5>
Martin fowler devops <a href="http://remmont.com">Martin fowler devops</a> Martin fowler devops
SOURCE: <h6>Martin fowler devops</h6> <a href="https://dev-ops.engineer/">Martin fowler devops</a> Martin fowler devops
#tags#[replace: -,-Martin fowler devops] Martin fowler devops#tags#
https://ssylki.info/?who=remmont.com/ku ... te-im-netz https://ssylki.info/?who=remmont.com/big-sandy-jail-2 https://ssylki.info/?who=remmont.com/narpo https://ssylki.info/?who=remmont.com/%D ... 0%BE%D0%BE https://ssylki.info/?who=best-life-insu ... emmont.com

[SprinfieldKn]

Freecharge cash add promo code
<p><a href="http://remmont.com/freecharge-cash-add-promo-code/">Freecharge cash add promo code</a></p>
<p>Freecharge cash add promo code-Freecharge cash add promo code Freecharge cash add promo code-Freecharge Add Money Offer, Coupon, Promo Codes- Add money in FC wallet & get extra cashback for old & new users.GRAB 5 New Active Coupons [Updated – TODAY] Freecharge Add Money Offer | Promo Code | Coupons [NEW] Add money in your FC wallet and get extra cashback by using Freecharge Add Money Offer. Use add money offers, couponsВ Promo Codes mentioned in this post to avail free extra cashback every time. Presenting You The Freecharge Add Money Offer, Coupons, Promo Codes For Today Freecharge Add Money ...</p>
<p>REMMONT.COM #Russia #Syria #Turkey #Ukraine #Yemen #USA</p>
<div>
<h3>Related posts:</h3><ol>
<li><a href="http://remmont.com/freecharge-add-money-promo-code/" title="Freecharge add money promo code">Freecharge add money promo code </a></li>
<li><a href="http://remmont.com/freecharge-promo-code-on-add-money/" title="Freecharge promo code on add money">Freecharge promo code on add money </a></li>
<li><a href="http://remmont.com/promo-code-for-freecharge-add-money/" title="Promo code for freecharge add money">Promo code for freecharge add money </a></li>
</ol>
</div>
https://ssylki.info/?who=remmont.comhtt ... tt-careers https://ssylki.info/?who=remmont.com/mu ... e-prison-3 https://ssylki.info/?who=apartment-list.remmont.com

[SprinfieldKn]

Credit one customer login #Credit #one #customer #login
<p><a href="http://remmont.com/credit-one-customer-login-credit-one-customer-login-2/">Credit one customer login #Credit #one #customer #login</a></p>
<p><img width="824" height="464" src="http://remmont.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/credit-one-customer-login-credit-one-customer-login-1-1024x576.jpg" alt="">Credit one customer login Credit One Bank This company is not yet accredited. To learn more, see reviews below or submit your own. Find the Best Card Save and Earn Rewards – Compare Cards Side by Side 2479 Credit One Bank Consumer Reviews and Complaints A link has directed you to this review. Its location on this page may change next time you visit. Credit One cards are a rip off. I pay so much on them monthly but still my credit limit isn’t going up?? Where is my money going. It seems the money I pay is going somewhere ...</p>
<p>REMMONT.COM #Russia #Syria #Turkey #Ukraine #Yemen #USA</p>
<div>
<h3>Related posts:</h3><ol>
<li><a href="http://remmont.com/credit-one-customer-login-credit-one-customer-login/" title="Credit one customer login #Credit #one #customer #login">Credit one customer login #Credit #one #customer #login </a></li>
<li><a href="http://remmont.com/credit-one-login-not-working-credit-one-login-not-working/" title="Credit one login not working #Credit #one #login #not #working">Credit one login not working #Credit #one #login #not #working </a></li>
<li><a href="http://remmont.com/credit-one-credit-one-login-credit-one-credit-one-login/" title="Credit one credit one login #Credit #one #credit #one #login">Credit one credit one login #Credit #one #credit #one #login </a></li>
</ol>
</div>
https://ssylki.info/?who=loan-forgiveness.remmont.com https://ssylki.info/?who=annual-credit- ... emmont.com https://ssylki.info/?who=remmont.com/go ... h-hurley-6