I'm not technically on diet or anything but due to the genetics in my family I have to stay away from fried food as much as possible. My cholesterol was borderline high last year. It's good now, just got it check this morning at my jobs health fair.
I have to agree with all of these except F-Zero X. That one has gotten better with age for me. Controls are nearly perfect and the rudimentary graphics running at 60 fps looks neat.
For highly factual, well sourced journalism?
From what I've seen out of the new screenshots, they did. ,From what I've seen out of the new screenshots, they did.Yeah, they look a lot better now than what we saw from the trailer that came out last year.I'm getting huge vintage AM2 vibes.,Well, from a business perspective it's kind of smart. Why invest all of your resources going all in, if it's a risky venture to begin with?,From what I've seen out of the new screenshots, they did.You can see improved animation from the screenshots, classic!,From what I've seen out of the new screenshots, they did.You can see improved animation from the screenshots, classic!I've been following this game for a while, and even the screenshots show a difference. Also, is it hard for you to fathom that after one year they could've improved it? ,From what I've seen out of the new screenshots, they did.You can see improved animation from the screenshots, classic!I've been following this game for a while, and even the screenshots show a difference. Also, is it hard for you to fathom that after one year they could've improved it?Might I suggest meaning of the word animation? Oh well, it ties again to my previous however I should also add:That is assuming YOU ever had a point with any of your threads or posts.
Yea, that was kind of a shitty reset button. All that stuff in GOTG2 has effectively been nullified.
I imagine that's not such a bad thing, though. Well, unless you didn't like the Batman Arkham games.
To me this coming up installment: Three Houses looks pretty good and I guess the developers wanted to try something different.I'm expecting Gamespot will give it 8 or 9 out of 10.Anyways I would choose Fire Emblem: Three Houses over Persona 5: The Royal, Shin Megami Tensei V and Kingdom Hearts 3.,The only 3 things I care about Disney:Star WarsTronSplit/Second,To me this coming up installment: Three Houses looks pretty good and I guess the developers wanted to try something different.I'm expecting Gamespot will give it 8 or 9 out of 10.Anyways I would choose Fire Emblem: Three Houses over Persona 5: The Royal, Shin Megami Tensei V and Kingdom Hearts 3.Kinda thought it looked like an upscaled 3DS game. And I vastly prefer pre-3D FE visuals. All animations went from awesome to generic as soon as FE went 3D.With that said, I'd still choose this new FE over those games you listed as well. The gameplay is still great fun. ,Well Persona's fan service is even worse than Fire Emblem IMO.Disagreed and wtf. How is pairing your fav waifu ,marrying them and then have their kids from future calling your barely 17 waifu "mom", is better than some social link/confidant interactions in persona whom all you can friendzone?Elaborate please.,Well Persona's fan service is even worse than Fire Emblem IMO.Disagreed and wtf. How is pairing your fav waifu ,marrying them and then have their kids from future calling your barely 17 waifu "mom", is better than some social link/confidant interactions in persona whom all you can friendzone?Elaborate please.Because in Persona you get to see more sexualised imagery than Fire Emblem when it comes to their main series.Notice on their ESRB rating:Persona, Rated M for MatureFire Emblem, Rated T for Teen,Well Persona's fan service is even worse than Fire Emblem IMO.Disagreed and wtf. How is pairing your fav waifu ,marrying them and then have their kids from future calling your barely 17 waifu "mom", is better than some social link/confidant interactions in persona whom all you can friendzone?Elaborate please.Because in Persona you get to see more sexualised imagery than Fire Emblem when it comes to their main series.Notice on their ESRB rating:Persona, Rated M for MatureFire Emblem, Rated T for TeenGive me an example of more sexualized imagery better than what I have mentioned on FE. Lets see what is even more oversexualized in Persona compared to bringing ur waifu to your room and playing the skinship minigames in FE Fates.,Disagreed and wtf. How is pairing your fav waifu ,marrying them and then have their kids from future calling your barely 17 waifu "mom", is better than some social link/confidant interactions in persona whom all you can friendzone?Elaborate please.Because in Persona you get to see more sexualised imagery than Fire Emblem when it comes to their main series.Notice on their ESRB rating:Persona, Rated M for MatureFire Emblem, Rated T for TeenGive me an example of more sexualized imagery better than what I have mentioned on FE. Lets see what is even more oversexualized in Persona compared to bringing ur waifu to your room and playing the skinship minigames in FE Fates.In Persona 5, one of the scenes: Ann is required to do something for Yusuke's art work which she refuses to do it.,Disagreed and wtf. How is pairing your fav waifu ,marrying them and then have their kids from future calling your barely 17 waifu "mom", is better than some social link/confidant interactions in persona whom all you can friendzone?Elaborate please.Because in Persona you get to see more sexualised imagery than Fire Emblem when it comes to their main series.Notice on their ESRB rating:Persona, Rated M for MatureFire Emblem, Rated T for TeenGive me an example of more sexualized imagery better than what I have mentioned on FE. Lets see what is even more oversexualized in Persona compared to bringing ur waifu to your room and playing the skinship minigames in FE Fates.In Persona 5, one of the scenes: Ann is required to do something for Yusuke art work which she refuses to do it.Let's be honest everything about Ann makes it worse than Fire Emblem ... the "skinship" minigames didn't make it to the west version did they?Then again, the Fire Emblem phone games is clearly a waifu collection game....,Yet I remember you comparing Grand Theft Auto V (Open World Action Adventure) to Forza Horizon 4 (Open World Arcade Street Racer) lolz.,To me this coming up installment: Three Houses looks pretty good and I guess the developers wanted to try something different.I'm expecting Gamespot will give it 8 or 9 out of 10.Anyways I would choose Fire Emblem: Three Houses over Persona 5: The Royal, Shin Megami Tensei V and Kingdom Hearts 3.Kinda thought it looked like an upscaled 3DS game. And I vastly prefer pre-3D FE visuals. All animations went from awesome to generic as soon as FE went 3D.With that said, I'd still choose this new FE over those games you listed as well. The gameplay is still great fun. I agreed.I'm still thinking to buy Fire Emblem: Three Houses when it gets reviewed, even if it's rated 8 out of 10 then I will still buy it for my Nintendo Switch.I also started Fire Emblem since Heroes (Free 2 Play mobile phone game app) to familiarise with the franchise and tactical role playing games.,I had the same thought. Since when is Kingdom Hearts "the one to beat"?Never was, never will.
Not me... their universe sucks.
PS5 is really gonna be something special. Last time Sony had a potential lineup this good was the PS2 era. I'm drooling thinking about HZD and GOW in 4K60fps on PS5.
Nothing wrong with using a horse to commute in the early, expensive, unreliable days of motor vehicles. Streaming is kind of like that. An infant. There exist over 500,000 movies. Even having streaming access to a tiny fraction of that requires paying for like four subscriptions. Wait... I don't know why I'm typing this. You didn't counter anything he said, so why should I expect you to acknowledge this?
There is a chaupla version? I mean I know they added the double stack Taco version but I didn't see a chaupla version.
Are you for democracy or are you against it? because from this post you seem to be very much against it.What does this even mean? That because I favor a democratic political system, all of a sudden everything should be put up for a vote to determine its validity? You're just creating a strawman and a false dichotomy which you think people need to adhere to. I have an idea, let's put your gender identify up for a vote in this forum. If more people think you identify as a beagle, therefore you must be a beagle. This is what you're essentially advocating for. ,What does that mean? It?s pretty clear are you for or against Democracy? It?s not that hard to answer yes or no.Also, no one said everything should be up for a vote but as long as the public school is in accordance with the law they can do whatever the majority wants,What does that mean? It?s pretty clear are you for or against Democracy? It?s not that hard to answer yes or no.I've already described to you why this line of reasoning is asinine. If you can't realize it, then I can't help you. Fundamental facts about the universe are not subject to a popularity contest. ,Humans didnt come from monkeys. Humans had a common ancestor with from monkeys, we are great apes.There were others like us, they are now extinct. It is one of the reasons fantasy is quite often quite fascinating, what if the other humanoids didnt go extinct?@Ovirew said: @thehig1: I'm not saying humans are better than other creatures or are even wholly good, I just think we're clearly different than the other living things on this planet. Our ability to communicate, think and create goes well above what every other species on our planet can do. We've completely changed the world, from how it was before us - whether or not we've made any real impact idk, but we've done a lot in a relatively short time.These are traits found among animals as well. Several species of animals out there do use tools. Sometimes even make them.@Ovirew said: The amount of rudeness and annoyance I've experienced from religious people has been far less than what I've experienced from athiests and progressives over the years, tbh. Really I hear more putting-down of religion than I've ever heard of fire and brimstone.My view? At the end of the day liberal scientists will do studies and research and walk away with whatever tidbits of affirmation they can to support their agendas. That's their whole game.Liberals constantly call for proof and reason from Conservatives. But Liberals also strongly support homosexuality. Homosexuality, if you get right down to it, kind of doesn't make sense.But Liberal scientists will come up with hundreds of reasons why homosexuality might have a purpose. They'll say it has benefits, they'll say at one time women were men but evolved into their current form. But at the end of the day it's, from a scientific standpoint, something that goes against the norm and rationality.Of course Conservative religious people have their bs, too. To them apparently women were created from a man's rib, I guess?But I get the impression that science is basically a weapon the Left uses to push suspicions as word.The left?Science doesnt care about our petty politics, science is above that. And science trying to support agendas is the OPPOSITE of what science is about. And being caught doing that is enough to get you discredited. Ever been to a scientific debate/discussion? We show our opponents our entire hand, because the goal is to get to the truth.Argument from Personal incredulity on the homosexuality bit.Actually if you know what determines sex geneticially it is not hard to see how we evolved from asexual reproduction, to having 2 sexes. The theory of evolution does a phenomenal job explainnig that. And while I am at it, read up on the SRY gene and Testis Determining Factor.Science is not a weapon of the left, or the right. Nor is science suspicions, they are a body of well documented phenomenon.,What does that mean? It?s pretty clear are you for or against Democracy? It?s not that hard to answer yes or no.I've already described to you why this line of reasoning is asinine. If you can't realize it, then I can't help you. Fundamental facts about the universe are not subject to a popularity contest.And your description is completely absurd. Do you understand how democracy works? Also, do you know what they teach in religious schools? also that anyone can home school their kids which is happening a lot more often then you think. The law is the only thing that regulates schools curriculums, outside that and as long as the school is in accordance with the law, there is nothing keeping a private school from teaching creationism. ,Entertainment.,And your description is completely absurd.Do you understand how democracy works? Also, do you know what they teach in religious schools? also that anyone can home school their kids which is happening a lot more often then you think.The law is the only thing that regulates schools curriculums, outside that and as long as the school is in accordance with the law, there is nothing keeping a private school from teaching creationism.I'm not advocating for private schools to teach creationism, you can throw that argument out the window. I'm talking about public institutions. You're entire premise is that 'Not supporting a democratic vote in one instance = Not supporting democracy in general'. That's where your argument is hitting a road block since it's a strawman and it's clear you don't have the ability to properly dissect an argument based on it's own merits. ,And your description is completely absurd.Do you understand how democracy works? Also, do you know what they teach in religious schools? also that anyone can home school their kids which is happening a lot more often then you think.The law is the only thing that regulates schools curriculums, outside that and as long as the school is in accordance with the law, there is nothing keeping a private school from teaching creationism.I'm not advocating for private schools to teach creationism, you can throw that argument out the window. I'm talking about public institutions.You're entire premise is that 'Not supporting a democratic vote in one instance = Not supporting democracy in general'. That's where your argument is hitting a road block since it's a strawman and it's clear you don't have the ability to properly dissect an argument based on it's own merits.It does not matter if it?s private or public schools, we were debating what they can/can?t do, and to be absolutely clear as long as they abide by the law the school could teach creationism or ID as it?s called today. And you can?t hide your entire counter to my argument is equivalent to sticking your fingers in your ears and going "nananananana" which is the same as not acknowledging democracy. ,I'm not advocating for private schools to teach creationism, you can throw that argument out the window. I'm talking about public institutions.You're entire premise is that 'Not supporting a democratic vote in one instance = Not supporting democracy in general'. That's where your argument is hitting a road block since it's a strawman and it's clear you don't have the ability to properly dissect an argument based on it's own merits.It does not matter if it?s private or public schools, we were debating what they can/can?t do, and to be absolutely clear as long as they abide by the law the school could teach creationism or ID as it?s called today.And you can?t hide your entire counter to my argument is equivalent to sticking your fingers in your ears and going "nananananana" which is the same as not acknowledging democracy.It does matter if they are private or public, one is publicly funded. And no, if you keep insisting on the above fallacy (the democratic voting shtick), then there's no use in continuing this conversation. It's just you being disingenuous. ,Entertainment.Touche.Though that does lend credence to this argument:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problem_of_evil,I don't want to put words in your mouth, but US education doesn't teach people that God doesn't exist. I'm personally fine with people thinking that God guided evolution because at least they believe in evolution. I'm not at all fine with people thinking evolution is a big lie however.
People still play it on Gameranger.
in 2016, I couldn't be bothered to do individual results.
This is pretty much it. He was far more centrist than most on the right would admit to.
https://cyberia.plati.market/games/two-point-hospital/ Yourself...?
Mobile Connection
Forums
its because you still havenot played Metro yet my friend.
Political Gamers
Jump to Top
No it is you who can't be taken seriously even if SSD was a damn given which wasn't and even a thread with a poll was make here about it,still would be BIG ass NEWS.
Jump to Top
this guy gets it.
