Oh okay, well thank you.,Same. I hear it's nearly complete. Possibly be out before this drops anyhow.OT, apparently RE4 and REmake will only be available by download (at least according to Era). That pretty much stops me from this purchase .,Bullshit.,Many people love RE my friend, this is not some new phenomenon,,They're some of the silliest in the SW barnyard that's for sure....lol

,Oh come on now. The new Yoshi in March. The last Direct mentions quite a few new titles coming out. Every console gets filler titles and ports. I don't think anyone ever singled out Nintendo for being special and not getting them.Heck, this is that third party support that they so desperately need. And yeah, it starts with ports, but then gets better. Look at how they're also getting MK11 day and date along with Doom Eternal. That's a huge improvement over past Nintendo consoles.,Many people love RE my friend, this is not some new phenomenon,but never before even in GT days 10 years ago you praise RE series. now you praise it like half life.
You're telling me the Undertake can't control electricity?
I've never even thought of modifying them because they were never an issue for me, i don't know of any good ones.
You can actually look at your purchase history in your profile settings to find out if you want.
Probably waiting for E3. They only like to reveal characters at events or in Directs.
Again, though, I have no problem with that. The backer knows what he's getting himself in for. Also, when the sh!t
Dude the term hack and slash for years has been use to describe single player games with sword play,never EVEEEEERRRRRRR has a game with characters carrying just a gun been call hack and slash.
It's specifically related to their VR hardware, and that certainly isn't a mobile headset either.
Yes, yes you are!=p Long time no see as well!
I might just go for it then... after I finish Guns, Gore & Cannoli 2.
Completely agree with you. These were the only horror movies to actually scare me in my adult life. I didn't sleep the night I saw the first one.
Kinda funny tho. Like they discovered 5200 rpm harddrive are trash and ssd exists in the year 2019.,I know they will be bigger,that is one concern i have because SSD prices are not even close to how prices were for 500GB drives in 2013, 1 TB still is like a $100 when on those days 500GB drives were like 50 dollars for consumers or less.2TB ones are simply over $200.Don't know how sony will pull it off,but i don't think they will fragment the user base by having 2 sku with different drives that would be suicidal.,Why do you want Knack anyways? Knack is a poor game at PS4's launch.,My current PS4 has 1TB of space.Next gen games will be bigger still, so we will at least need a 512GB or 1TB SSD. That will cost a lot of money bro. I'm thinking the basic model won't come with an SSD, with an option to buy a pro model with faster loading times.All models need to have the SSD to make the gameplay improvements showcased possible. The speed at which you can move through the world is central to the entire design of an open world game. You can't expect developers to make two versions.But I agree with you the numbers don't quite add up. Would be pretty annoying if you could only have a few games installed at once. Even though for the most part it wouldn't affect me as I rarely have more than a couple of active game at the time. ,Dude data on 360 games is 7.4GB with extremely low assets vs a game like today that is more than 50GB on low settings,the jump from 360 to xbox one X or even xbox one is greater than the jump you will see from PS4 to PS5 ,A PS4 game now is a PC game with lower assets you take Spider man and run it on a 2080 with higher quality assets and you are essentially in the next gen.While i don't expect loading to be eliminate anything done to reduce them will be great , in the way this probably works,loading data on Ram the whole data will never be load as no console will have enough ram to store a complete game,the xbox one X could load an xbox 360 game completely in Ram, and still have enough ram to emulate the game with higher quality.Games like RDR2 are 100GB even without having ultra high quality textures.I am sure spiderman was use as example because it has many buildings if you scroll fast you start to see buildings pop in.Spider man on PS4 Pro doesn't equate to a 360 game when the PS5 hit,remember the PS Pro is a mid gen release,the jump you will get from PS4 pro to PS5 will not be as big as PS3 to PS4,even less if we consider that PS3 games for years pass 30GB and even more because of Blu-ray while MS games were constricted to 7.4GB of DVD 9.I'm expecting we'll see games in the 200-300 GB range next gen with a hell of a lot more going on which requires far more extensive loading, and to add to this when developers get more resources a lot of them simply get "lazy". Not to say they're incompetent but when they don't need to compress things they won't, they'll just dump them as they are. I'm expecting better loading in next-gen games but not the pipe dream Sony is showing off in last generation games. ,Why do you want Knack anyways? Knack is a poor game at PS4's launch.Back before PS4 launch, I only pick two launch titles, Kilzone: Shadowfall & Knack, but at the time, I didn't know much of Knack and decided to buy it without reading the reviews first. Went into it with quite low expectations but was pleasantly surprised and ended up playing through it twice! I think it's a great game in my opinion but I do understand why it's hated towards other gamers. Knack 2 is actually a great action game. Lots of tech and good, aggressive enemies on Very Hard mode. Combat depth is actually decent so it's why I wouldn't mind seeing Knack 3 if Sony makes it as a launch title for PS5. Knack games aren't that expensive to make and are easy to make diminishing-returns, no one expected Knack 2, so who's to say their won't be Knack 3? ,The Switch has a 18W tdp vs the Pros 165W. And it's not like the PS4 Pro is using the disc for anything other than DRM if there is even a disc used in this comparison. That 8GB of GDDR5 is losing to 4GB of LPDDR4. ,I know they will be bigger,that is one concern i have because SSD prices are not even close to how prices were for 500GB drives in 2013, 1 TB still is like a $100 when on those days 500GB drives were like 50 dollars for consumers or less.2TB ones are simply over $200.Don't know how sony will pull it off,but i don't think they will fragment the user base by having 2 sku with different drives that would be suicidal.I know they will be bigger,that is one concern i have because SSD prices are not even close to how prices were for 500GB drives in 2013,So Sony went out an bought the drives in 2013 at 2013 prices for the PS4 that they launched in 2013. But for the next console they will buy the drives at prices 18-24 months before the console launch. Obvious you don't know what your talking about.But keep being shocked at how the mighty Sony will pull it off.,Something that always bugged me as PC gamer for the past decades, as well as my experience with handhelds over the past decade or so: I just don't like having to uninstall stuff in order to install new games

Sometimes it got pretty bad for me and I constantly had to find this balance not to fill up my 256GB PC HDD or 512MB PSP memory card... Having to choose between what game to uninstall so I could install some sweet new game

I know it's a first world problem and it's a silly thing to worry about. But it's part of the reason why I went with 1TB Xbox and PS4 consoles. Not having to worry about running out of space. It's something I'll choose to spend money on, to avoid running into issues in the future.But your argument does make a lot of sense. If they make this SSD out like this big thing, they can't be running another SKU with a slower 5200RPM hard disk drive.,Ok so i have seen this argument twice in this thread.First things first PS4 games are huge,in fact Spiderman is some 45GB or more,there is no way to load all that data in Ram at any given time on PS5 unless it has 64GB of ram and even so games like RDR2 are 100GB long, so loading spiderman in just 0.8 seconds is huge,and will potentially eliminate long load times even on bigger games,trying to say that as game will be bigger we will be in the same spot is not quite accurate at all.The game doesn't need to be completely loaded in one pass to make those loading seem invisible or close.PS4 Pro's game world scope is based on system memory i.e. 5.5 GB RAM with ~60 MB/s to ~100 MB/s compressed data chunks from HDD.PC OEM favorite low cost Samsung PM961 NVMe delivers ~3100 MB/s seq read with Intel. Current Ryzen can reach ~3000 MB/s seq read with Samsung PM961 NVMe.
https://cyberia.plati.market/games/scum/?lang=ru-RU ? Move topic to another board
I have to ask. Which conspiracy theories have they created?They don?t have to create conspiracies they can just use already existing onesBut Russian Collusion, Pee Tape, the Clinton foundation Trump-Report, the Maga-hat kids being "racist" etc. etc. etc. etc.But some of the Maga hat kids were being racist. That's on video.Pee Tape thing seems to be for comedy effect, but anyone who thinks it is real without proof is indeed being a conspiracy theorist.And Clinton foundation Trump Report? Link?As for Russian Collusion I'd be more specific and say criminal collusion. Those are indeed conspiracy theories.,I have to ask. Which conspiracy theories have they created?They don?t have to create conspiracies they can just use already existing onesBut Russian Collusion, Pee Tape, the Clinton foundation Trump-Report, the Maga-hat kids being "racist" etc. etc. etc. etc.But some of the Maga hat kids were being racist. That's on video.Pee Tape thing seems to be for comedy effect, but anyone who thinks it is real without proof is indeed being a conspiracy theorist.And Clinton foundation Trump Report? Link?As for Russian Collusion I'd be more specific and say criminal collusion. Those are indeed conspiracy theories.Well, the whole media and especially Wash out post?s angle was horrible kids with maga hats makes racist remarks, when in fact it was the other side far-leftists who instigated it all.And Pee tape may be now for comedy effect, but CNN published it as big breaking news even though there was zero evidence.And the gates report paid by the Clinton Foundation. Also, the Russia thing is amazing to watch how the mainstream media still goes on and on like the report didn?t blow it out of the water and Adam Schiff is the left?s Alex Jones, he still claims Trump colluded with Russia.,OkBut don?t be sad at least you tried so go try again.,Link?@Jacanuk said: Also, the Russia thing is amazing to watch how the mainstream media still goes on and on like the report didn?t blow it out of the water and Adam Schiff is the left?s Alex Jones, he still claims Trump colluded with Russia.Someone can still claim they colluded based off of what we know and not be a conspiracy theories. You just can't claim it was criminal collusion, that's a conspiracy theory.,Citation please.Anyone who said Russia didn't meddle was a conspiracy theorist. And they got roasted by me here.,I have to ask. Which conspiracy theories have they created?They don?t have to create conspiracies they can just use already existing onesBut Russian Collusion, Pee Tape, the Clinton foundation Trump-Report, the Maga-hat kids being "racist" etc. etc. etc. etc.Russia interfered, and not evidence was found to clear Trump. Pee Tape??? Never heard. What did the Clinton foundation do? Some of those kids were caught being racist on tape...??? ,See this is where the conspiracy works You think there was no evidence to exonerate Trump when the report clear as day says there was absolutely zero evidence of any collusion and there was nothing at all to connect Trump or his family to anything. What the report also said was that it was not possible to prove obstruction of justice, which relates to Comey, not to the Russia collusion hoax.Also, you know exactly what tape and the Gates report from the discredited former MI5 agent were paid for by the Clinton Foundation.,Quote my conspiracy claim.,See this is where the conspiracy worksYou think there was no evidence to exonerate Trump when the report clear as day says there was absolutely zero evidence of any collusion and there was nothing at all to connect Trump or his family to anything.What the report also said was that it was not possible to prove obstruction of justice, which relates to Comey, not to the Russia collusion hoax.Also, you know exactly what tape and the Gates report from the discredited former MI5 agent were paid for by the Clinton Foundation.If I have mixed up the two, then that one goes on me(which one he wasn't exonerated on). However the quote "while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him" Doesn't do Trump much good. Again I have plenty of politics in my own country to follow, so some of the US topics I forget. The Clinton foundation is one I have forgotten. ,That quote is taken out of context if you think it refers to the report in its entirety - That quote only covers the possible obstruction of justice. Trump clearly fired Comey but his intent and reasons are very hard to prove.So while we 100% agree that Trump was not "exonerated" on obstruction, he was indeed 100% exonerated as to collusion with anyone even remotely Russia-related.Also, I thought you had moved to the US, but I might have mistaken you for another moderator, so it?s clearly ok that you don?t keep up with all the nonsense that happens over here in the US, Norway has it?s own i am sure. Anyways the Pee-Tape refers to a Steele (not gates) report that was pure fiction mixed up with some smaller truths , so Buzzfeed published the entire report as facts and that Trump had paid Russian prostitutes to pee on him while in Russia, which is pure fiction and while CNN didn?t want to cover it at first, they went all breaking news once their back was covered and Buzzfeed had brought it first.,Citation Needed.Prove I said that., while CNN didn?t want to cover it at first, they went all breaking news once their back was covered and Buzzfeed had brought it first.Link?I'm pretty sure they said it was alleged and potential. Not that it was fact. Taking away any conspiracy angle.Oh and the report did have accurate elements, making it not a fully conspiracy theory., while CNN didn?t want to cover it at first, they went all breaking news once their back was covered and Buzzfeed had brought it first.Link?I'm pretty sure they said it was alleged and potential. Not that it was fact. Taking away any conspiracy angle.Oh and the report did have accurate elements, making it not a fully conspiracy theory.If you have a burger that is 90% shit and 10% Kobe beef, are you eating shit or a Kobe beef?According to the Media Research Center, CNN took Comey? cue and ran with the unverified story, repeating it 77 times between April 12 and April 16.On April 13, the network repeated the claim a whopping 48 times, while 28 of the 77 mentions came from CNN replaying Comey? ABC interview.MRC analysts found that CNN used various dirty phrases such as ?rostitutes urinating on each other,??olden showers,?and of course, ?ee tape.?/p>,Not sure about 90%. And not sure who said it was 100% legitimate.Most news channels I watched were smart and responsible enough to say alleged or unverified unless the data was confirmed. And there HAS been confirmed data.Revisiting the Trump-Russia dossier: What's right, wrong and still unclear?https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/07/politics/dossier-two-years-later/index.htmlWhile Trump and his supporters have seized on the most salacious, uncorroborated claims to discredit the dossier as a "pile of garbage," much of Steele's memos focused on Russia's role interfering in the 2016 election. Steele's intelligence memos detail a pattern and preference for Trump that have since been confirmed by the US intelligence community and indictments against Russians brought by Mueller's investigation.Another allegation that's proven true: Steele's sources noted that the Russian government had indirectly paid Michael Flynn to travel to Moscow, a reference to his attendance at a 2015 gala honoring the state-run broadcaster RT.Flynn, who later advised Trump's campaign and was briefly Trump's national security adviser, denied during the campaign that he received any payments from Russia.The dossier said that the hacks against Democrats, which were publicly released by WikiLeaks during the 2016 campaign, were part of a wider Russian hacking effort. That has since been confirmed in Mueller's court filings, and last year, the special counsel indicted a dozen Russian intelligence agents in connection with the hacks.The dossier also noted efforts from the Russian government to exploit political divisions within the US and the Democratic Party after the bruising primary fight between Clinton and Sen. Bernie Sanders. A separate Mueller indictment dealt with disinformation efforts by a Kremlin-linked troll farm that played on those divisions. Since the 2016 election, social media companies have pulled thousands of accounts tied to Russia.However, anyone who says the whole thing, including the Pee, is completely facts is indeed being a Conspiracy theorist.,CNN doesn?t have to say it?s real, by reporting it they insinuated as much, since when does any serious journalistic media report fake stories? you know lies are lies even at CNN and forgot the period was after Comey?s fake book and not the initial reports.And as you can see CNN was together with Buzzfeed all over this conspiracy theoryThe dossier, which is a collection of memos written over a period of months, includes specific, unverified, and potentially unverifiable allegations of contact between Trump aides and Russian operatives, and graphic claims of sexual acts documented by the Russians. CNN reported Tuesday that a two-page synopsis of the report was given to President Barack Obama and Trump.,They didn't insinuate it. They merely pointed out what is verified and what is not verified. Like any responsible news source would do. If it had nothing that was verified, yes it would be irresponsible to report on it (But even then, not conspiratorial). BUT IT DID have many true elements, so there goes your entire argument. This isn't rocket science.No reason to lie.Revisiting the Trump-Russia dossier: What's right, wrong and still unclear?@Jacanuk said: And as you can see CNN was together with Buzzfeed all over this conspiracy theoryThe dossier, which is a collection of memos written over a period of months, includes specific, unverified, and potentially unverifiable allegations of contact between Trump aides and Russian operatives, and graphic claims of sexual acts documented by the Russians. CNN reported Tuesday that a two-page synopsis of the report was given to President Barack Obama and Trump."CNN reported Tuesday that a two-page synopsis of the report was given to President Barack Obama and Trump."That's a factual event, and it was HUGE breaking news. Please stop getting mad at factual reporting of real events.,What conspiracy theory?@Jacanuk said: since when does any serious journalistic media report fake stories? What fake story?You mean when they initially reported on the fact that Trump and Obama were given briefings on the Dossier?Or are you talking about when they accurately point out portions of the Dossier that are confirmed or unconfirmed? How is that fake or conspiratorial?This thread isn't about your opinion. I think he wanted real conspiracy theories - not stuff that makes you mad.,They didn't insinuate it. They said alleged and unverified if it was alleged or unverified. They also only said confirmed if the data was actually confirmed, which some of it was. This isn't rocket science. You're wildly bending the definition of conspiracy theory.No reason to lie.Revisiting the Trump-Russia dossier: What's right, wrong and still unclear?@Jacanuk said: And as you can see CNN was together with Buzzfeed all over this conspiracy theoryThe dossier, which is a collection of memos written over a period of months, includes specific, unverified, and potentially unverifiable allegations of contact between Trump aides and Russian operatives, and graphic claims of sexual acts documented by the Russians. CNN reported Tuesday that a two-page synopsis of the report was given to President Barack Obama and Trump."CNN reported Tuesday that a two-page synopsis of the report was given to President Barack Obama and Trump."That's a factual event, and it was HUGE breaking news. Please stop getting mad at factual reporting of real events.And that report was as fake as the dossier and you still claiming even the dossier is true is literally insane.Ex-FBI Director James Comey denied reporting by CNN early last year which said he briefed then President-elect Trump on the so-called "Trump dossier" with a two-page synopsis.But it proves why conspiracy nuts have so much success and why people do it, Someone will always keep believing it no matter what.,The dossier isn't fake. It exists. I think what you're trying to say it contains all fake information.But we know that isn't true. It contains several confirmed things. Hence reporting on it isn't a conspiratorial theory.That's not a conspiracy theory unless the Source never labeled the items confirmed or unconfirmed, which CNN did every single time.Oh and Trump WAS briefed on it, the story wasn't fake it had 1 minor detail wrong:https://www.politico.com/story/2018/12/14/russia-dossier-fbi-trump-obama-1066643The FBI released for the first time Friday night a two-page summary former FBI Director James Comey used to brief President-elect Donald Trump nearly two years ago on a so-called dossier about Trump? ties to Russia.CNN got minor details wrong that Comey didn't literally present it, because it wasn't in person I believe. That is literally it. Which they corrected long ago, mind you. Is that what we are debating though?Is THAT the conspiracy??? LMAO!,FOX more so.,FOX more so.Mainstream media*,That's why I corrected him. Mainstream/corporate media is fake news. Very fake news, in fact.,FOX more so.Mainstream media*And non mainstream media like Dailycaller or Breitbart is far worse than any of them.
FC1, FC4 and FC5 all beat FC3
And all I said is that angry hoe is an idiot. sniper liking idiocy is an indictment on him, not me.
He also posts shockingly close to Boxrekt in style... Was
You completely destroyed him ??
window.amzn_assoc_title="Related products";
this guy gets it.